An emerging dilemma in bioethics concerns novel genome editing technologies capable of altering ecosystems. Such interventions, deployed in the shared space of the environment, should only be initiated if acceptable to the communities involved. But what does “acceptable” entail? By what process should scientists and communities jointly make decisions from the earliest stages of project planning? Working in the context of a nascent community-guided project to combat Lyme disease on the islands of Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard, this project will explore the reciprocity-based concept of “Responsive Science” as a model for community consent and decision-making during the development and real-world testing of novel ecological interventions.
A Mutually Responsive Approach to Developing Technologies That Alter Shared Ecosystems
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jason A. Delborne et al., Social license and synthetic biology: the trouble with mining terms, Journal of Responsible Innovation, Apr 2020.Read more
Delphine Thizy et al., Guidance on stakeholder engagement practices to inform the development of area-wide vector control methods, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Apr 2019.Read more